Comparison of Multiple Sets and Progressive Single Set of Resistance Training on Muscle Mass and Strength in Rat |
Yoon Aram1), Hong Jun-Young2), Choi Soon-Mi3), Hahn Dong-Woo1), Kim Ki-Jeong4), Lee Suk-Ho5)* |
1The University of Texas at Austin 2University of Houston 3Midwestern State University 4University of Ulsan 5Texas A&M University-San Antonio |
|
Received: May 7, 2015; Accepted: August 7, 2015. Published online: August 30, 2015. |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
PURPOSE: The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of different resistance protocols on muscle mass and function in rats.
METHODS: Thirty two Sprague-Dawley female rats, 8 weeks of age, were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=8 in each group): control (CON), resistance training 1 (RT1; 6 to 8 reps/1 set, every 3rd day), resistance training 2 (RT2; 5 reps/3 sets, every other day), resistance training 3 (RT3; 5 reps/3 sets, twice a day, every 3rd day). Ladder climbing was used as the resistance training method.
RESULTS: Muscle mass and cross sectional area (CSA) of flexor hallucis longus (FHL) and extensor carpi radialis (ECR) were increased in all resistance training groups (p<.05). Grip strength was significantly increased in RT3 group (p<.05). Peak twitch tension (Pt) was increased in RT1 and RT3 group, while peak tetanic tension (Po) was increased only in RT3 group (p<.05). There was no change of total protein concentration after training, however, myofibrillar protein contents were significantly increased in FHL and ECR muscles in all training groups.
CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that different resistance training protocol effectively induced the muscle hypertrophy by increasing myofibrillar protein contents. RT1, a low volume progressive single set resistance training protocol, is as effective as traditional high volume multi sets training protocol (RT2 and RT3) for increasing muscle strength in animal model. |
Key words:
Resistance training, Ladder climbing, Muscle contractile properties, Muscular protein |
|
|
|